Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Season of technical events in full swing. This week, Stripe and Figma collected thousands of people in downtown San Francisco for their conferences. It signed with Figma CEO Dylan field After the opening keywords in Config, where it announced the most important product expansion in the company’s history.
Below, you will find our chat about how Amnesty International sees Figma after a approximate start to integrate technology last year, the new areas it aims to develop the platform, and more. And he continued to read how Meta operates the heat on the AI team, my ideas about Openai’s news for this week, and more …
These days, Figma appears to have the entire creative software industry in its eyes.
Wednesday, CEO Dylan field He walked on the stage in front of about 8,000 people in the Moscow Center in San Francisco Advertise four new products: The initial models that resemble ChatGPT, a website builder, a hosting platform, an Amnesty International advertising tool, Kanva, and Adobe Illustrator.
the Last time I met the fieldFigma’s internal culture was reset after its sale of $ 20 billion to Adobe. When we fell after the keynote this week, I wanted to hear about his approaches to expand the Figma products group before it before it Planned public subscription (The latter who refused to talk about), and how his new method of artificial intelligence differs Last year’s approach to Figma in a problemAnd how he sees the company’s products that are accumulated against competition.
The following conversation was edited for length and clarity:
Last year, when I started integrating artificial intelligence into Figma, there was terror on this issue in this industry. The mood seems to have turned. Now, people began to accept the idea of artificial intelligence in these creative products. Do you feel this transformation?
I think people now understand what the models do, and this is different from Config 2024, where we had a different approach that the model was not driven, and we did not feel that he was fulfilling the mark.
The models are useful, and I think they come with the bares. We use Clade Sonnet 3.7 in the trial display. It is clear that it is normative. We can use other models, and will, in the future. The only constant thing is the change when it comes to developing models. You can not necessarily predict these models with what they will put, and if it is derived or unrecists.
From your point of view, is this delivery and operation model approaching now that you are now taking responsibility for you to the model provider?
We do our best wherever possible to create the qualities. For example, if you take a design from society, and we can discover that it came from society, then we put an attribution link in your code. At the same time, we cannot know when the model may remember something. It is not something we trained, right? So only there so far we can go here. This does not mean that it is not useful for the user.
Do you worry about the moderators’ action of more than Figma can do? How do you think about your place as an application in the world of artificial intelligence?
If we look back in the past decade in Figma, the thing that was amazing for me constantly is that we were really in this si -sided curve of the amount of programs. It is basically vertical. We will see more programs created more than ever due to artificial intelligence.
I really think the design and craftsmanship are the difference that makes the product and brand prominent. Can you be a symbol or penetrate your way towards something that earns money? definitely. But will it be a permanent product? Therefore, if you have any level of competition, you must have a really good design, a great user experience and a great brand. If you are thinking about all the context that humans have that LLM does not do that, then I do not see this is the situation that will you get there along the way.
How do you deal with the way Figma span to new products?
We see what people do in Figma already. In 2020, at times of the epidemic, people were dealing with Figma as a space for cooperation. We saw a lot of brainstorming and thinking. We had to pull this and make it its own surface because the Figma design was not improved for brainstorming, thinking, skiing on eggs or planning. We have seen that 5 per cent of files in Figma’s design were slices, so we went and made Figma slices. I think there is a lot inside Figma, in terms of use cases, which must be pulled.
Figma Make, which you just provided, is very wide as you can do. What is the goal?
We talk a lot about the process of moving from the idea to the product, which can include all types of different steps. Make the entire process extend. Sometimes you have an idea in your head, you love, “I want to produce this. I want to take it out there, or I want to use it for myself to repeat and know if it is already working.”
With Figma sites, are you aiming to compete with SquaresPace and WordPress? How deep is going to host the web and all that requires it?
Now, we are hosting. You can set a dedicated field. Figma sites have been made for a long time. You should either go to another place to publish it, or you can cord with all of Figma. Obviously, we hope the DeV mode will help in it, but if we can reach the point where you can only press the publishing button, it looks better for me for a designer trying to take out a site to the world. I think this is a very distinct use of SquaresPaces of the World, where, similar to Canva, targets more towards consumers and small companies.
Will you issue a mobile application for Figma Buzz, the marketing tool of artificial intelligence? If you do this, you may see her compete directly with Canva.
This is not in our plans now. I think we are now focusing on making sure that Buzz is really highly high -quality what we are trying to do on the web, and we can move from there.
I have the utmost respect for Canva. The founders are reliable. My perception of Canva is more on the side of the consumer and the small team. You are trying to do something quickly. Buzz focuses on brand assets. It is the state of the organization’s use.
Do you think tools like Buzz will replace digital ads as they are today?
I think there is a role in artificial intelligence in generating marketing assets. In tinnitus, you can create pictures and you can write the text. What I have not yet seen is a world in which models can generate content that the brand team is proud of. Perhaps this is coming, but it looks out of expected.
If you don’t already do, Do not forget to subscribe to freedomIncluding Unlimited access to Command line And all our reports.
As always, welcome your comments, especially if you have ideas about this problem or the idea of a story to share it. You can respond here or Ping to me safely to sign.