Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
California has The largest population of national immigrants in the nation With approximately 1.8 million people. In the last three decades, the Californians’ attitude about this fact has suffered an amazing swing.
Hostility reached a peak in the early 1990s, demonstrated by the passage of Proposal 187 In 1994 with margin 3-2. The measure would require the police to check the legal status of the people they were facing and banned public services, including education, of those who cannot prove citizenship or legal residence.
It was the central part of the Republican governor Pete Wilson’s second -term campaign, claiming that undocumented people overcome the state’s budget.
However, support for repression was not limited to GOP voters. Not only many Democrats-then, as now the largest block of voters voted for the measure, but the legislative power dominated by the Democrats adopted anti-immigrant laws by banning driving licenses.
Soon, however, public sentiment and the political atmosphere began to change. Unscounded immigrants and their defenders scored a big victory a year after the transition of Prop. violate the exclusive power of the federal government To regulate immigration.
“The predominant approval of the California voters of the proposal 187 reflects their justified dissatisfaction with the inability of the Federal Government to effectively implement immigration laws,” she wrote at that time. “As serious as the problem is, however, the powers to regulate immigration belongs exclusively to the federal government and state agencies, they have no right to accept this body. The state is powerless to adopt its own scheme for regulating immigration or developing immigration provisions that take place in parallel or in order to supplement the federal immigration laws. “
A few years later after Democrat Gray Davis inherited Wilson, The state abandoned a complaint of Pfaelzer’s decision. In the coming years, the legislature canceled other laws, such as that of driving licenses, and did everything possible to treat undocumented immigrants, as if they were legal residents, such as Expanding the benefits of healthcareS
When Donald Trump was elected president in 2016 and promised to repress illegal immigration, California responded with legislation to make it difficult for federal immigration authorities to capture and deport undecosed Californians.
The most important thing was Senate Bill 54Introduced a month after Trump won the election. Entitled the California Act in California, he essentially prohibits California police from helping federal efforts to identify and deport untouched immigrants.
SB 54 is experiencing a court challenge, but Trump is again in the White House, announcing his intention to deliver the nation from undocumented immigrants and is By accepted in California and other states with shrinesS
US Department of Justice has filed a claim for cancellation of Illinois laws Quite similar to the SB 54 in California and his claim in the Illinois case can – with great irony – can turn the federal court’s decision against prop. Exceptional power over immigration in prop. 187, the case suggests that the laws of the sanctuary also interfere with this power.
The 23 -page complaint filed with the Chicago Federal Court claims that Illinois’ laws are aimed at making it difficult and deliberately impede the ability of federal immigration officers to fulfill their responsibilities in these jurisdictions. “
California employees are aware that Illinois’ claim will not be the only challenge for local and state laws designed to protect the undecided immigrants.
Whether the argument of the Illinois suit to prevail, the situation in California could have come a full circle. A legal principle that defended California immigrants from support 187 in 1995 could facilitate their identification and deportation in 2025.
