Can Los Angeles effectively manage fire recovery efforts?

A saying, which is said to have originated in England from the 16th century, England postulates that “too many chefs spoil the broth.” When too many people work on a project without clear accountability, it can lead to a gloomy result.

Actually, Studies conducted at Princeton University 11 years ago it seems to be validated this. Iain Couzin, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and the senior author of the study, said it undermines the so -called “Wisdom of Verification” theory, which supports many entrances.

“This is a starting point that opens up the possibility of capturing collective decision making in a more realistic environment,” Kuzin said at the time. “When we see small groups of animals or organisms that make decisions, they are not necessarily compromising accuracy. They can actually deal with more people if more people have participated. I think this is the new insight. “

Examples of a spoiled broth are full of the political sphere, but a very obvious and current example is the California accidental approach to its worst crisis of homelessness.

Numerous government agencies, cities and cities are involved in aspects of the situation. Despite Awaiting $ 24 billion spent on the fact that Gavin Newsom became governor in 2019, the number of homeless in California continues to rise and the State Auditor has found that this on Newsom Interdepartmental Council on HomelessnessWho had to coordinate the efforts of the state failed to do so.

Local efforts for homelessness have also been affected by a lack of clear responsibility With urban and district officials aimed at each other.

What is happening or not in homelessness is a warning that a new crisis – recovering from extremely destructive and deadly fires that have passed through Los Angeles – can be littered.

On Monday, the UCLA School of Management Estimated property losses between $ 95 billion and $ 164 billionOther estimates range up to $ 250 billion. Tasks for cleaning, financing and restoration of schools and other public infrastructure, as well as thousands of homes and commercial structures, are almost constantly difficult.

As the fires were finally tamed, political figures like Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and local civic leaders and organizations began to raise money and offer ways for recovery operations.

However, As Los Angeles Times reportsMany recovery organizations make it difficult to determine who is truly responsible, the lack of clarity complicated by fires, which struck both neighborhoods within the city, such as the Pacific Palisades, and those ruled by the County, such as Altadena.

The answer to the recovery began badly when BAS appointed Steve Soboroff, a prominent civilian leader, as her recovery, just to face the reverse reaction that he was paid $ 500,000 for several months of work. In the end, he agreed to work for free, but the valve suggested that decisions were made without being completely checked.

Meanwhile, Rick Caruzo, another civilian leader whom Bass won to become mayor, announced his own efforts to recover from losses suffered by his family members, and sharply criticize the bass, who next year is facing a re -election campaign.

NEWSOM has spent many days visible monitoring of fire efforts $ 2.5 billion distribution from legislature And the search for federal funds from President Donald Trump, a longtime political foil. However, just after making a quick trip to Washington to support money requests, Newsom has signed legislation Assign a millions of dollars to fight Trump In court on other issues, the most prominent immigration.

NEWSOM also issued a Rules for refusing to indicate To allow housing owners to restore their homes, even in neighborhoods shown to be predisposed to destruction in previous fires.

Historians will see the fires that blackened much of Los Angeles this year as one of the most significant events of the state and how the recovery is managed or incorrect will be a legend.