Big Tech joins Big Oil as big users of CA policy


Large illuminated sign with inscription "DATA" is suspended from the ceiling, with holographic numbers, plus signs, and other symbols hanging around it. The reflective installation casts colorful light motifs. In the foreground is a blurred figure wearing a blue jacket, partially blocked by a glass surface. The scene is set in a modern conference or exhibition space with a high ceiling and metal frame.
The annual Dreamforce tech conference hosted by Salesforce in San Francisco on September 18, 2024. Photo by Florence Middleton for CalMatters

Big Tech spent $39 million to influence state policy last yearmaking 2025 a blockbuster spending year for Meta, Google and other tech companies looking to push their agenda to California officials.

As Jeremiah Kimmelman of CalMatters explains, the upcoming election, disputes over the regulation of artificial intelligence and the growth of the cryptocurrency industry have led Big Tech to spend big on political campaigns, donate to nonprofits, and hire lobbyists.

The $39 million makes the tech industry the biggest political spender in California, along with oil and gas industrygiving tech companies enormous leverage in Sacramento, critics say.

  • Catherine Braceyfounder of nonprofit TechEquity, which supports AI regulation: “There’s a question of why (tech companies) have to spend so much money. And that’s because they’re on the wrong side of history and people don’t like them very much.”

Since the start of the current biennial legislative session in December 2024, the state legislature has considered more than 50 bills that would regulate AI. Meta spent nearly $30 million in 2025 to influence politics in California, including $20 million for a policy committee it created that supports candidates who support AI deregulation. On lobbying state officials alone, the company spent at least $4.6 million — far more than any other year since 2010, when it began advocating at the state Capitol.

Crypto companies – which are relatively new tech players buying influence in the state – have also increased their spending. Coinbase spent $200,000 on state lobbying last year, including $60,000 for the California Democratic Party.

The industry’s political spending has proven significant before: Two years ago, it poured $10 million into a blitz campaign that helped knocked out then-Rep. Katie Portercrypto industry critic, from the California Senate race.

Read more.


Join us in Fresno Wednesday at 5:30 p.m. to hear the gubernatorial candidates address the issues most important to the Central Valley. Register now for the Central Valley Governor’s Forum moderated by CalMatters.

Be part of the conversations driving California forward at the CalMatters Festival of Ideas on May 21 in Sacramento. Get your tickets now.



Lawmakers want audit of CA fusion centers

A man wearing a black blazer looks ahead while sitting at a wooden desk surrounded by other people.
State Sen. Sabrina Cervantes, who requested the audit, at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Jan. 5, 2026. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters/Pool

As President Donald Trump continues his crackdown on immigration, fusion centers may be the next battlefield between the federal administration and immigration advocates, writes Khari Johnson of CalMatters.

Established across the country after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, these government facilities are hubs where federal, state and local agencies share and review security intelligence with each other.

Advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have urged lawmakers to audit the facilities for privacy violations that violate state laws. State lawmakers voted last week to audit the operations of five fusion centers in California.

Defenders of one incident pointed to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents involved, who are reportedly questioning local police to conduct searches for the federal agency at the Santa Ana Fusion Center. Past CalMatters investigations have revealed that local law enforcement illegally shared registration number information with ICE or Border Patrol.

Read more.

College Ready Compton Students

A teacher stands in front of a classroom full of students reading at their desks. The classroom is decorated with string lights and blue lanterns.
Teacher Catherine Borek with her senior students at Dominguez High School in Compton on March 20, 2026. Photo by Arianna Drechsler for CalMatters

Although students at Compton Unified’s Dominguez High are among the poorest in the state, the high school seniors have one distinguishing feature: A much higher percentage of them are set to attend a California public university than their peers statewideCalMatters’ Mikhail Zinstein and Carolyn Jones report.

To get into the University of California or California State University, high school students must take a set of courses known as AG courses, which include four years of English, three years of math, one year of art, and more.

Last spring, 96 percent of Dominguez High graduates were AG-ready — a remarkable rate considering that 46 percent of graduating seniors at traditional high schools did not take the required courses, according to a CalMatters analysis. Looking at data from the 2024-25 school year for 1,468 public high schools, CalMatters also found that 222 of those schools posted AG graduation rates below 30%.

Schools may have low levels of AG for many reasons: some do not offer them, while others have students who have not taken a key math or science course. Only a few fields make these classes part of the graduation requirement.

Read more.

Finally: Bill seeks to narrow the CEQA carve-out

Tesla workers examine Tesla workers examine a Model S used for training and instrument calibration at the company's factory in Fremont June 22, 2012. Photo by Noah Berger, REUTERS. A Model S used for tool training and calibration at the company's factory in Fremont June 22, 2012. REUTERS/Noah Berger
Tesla workers inspect a Model S at the company’s factory in Fremont June 22, 2012. Photo by Noah Berger, Reuters

A Democratic state senator has introduced a bill that would require certain manufacturing facilities located near poor or heavily polluted communities to undergo an environmental review. The proposal restores some mandates that were broadly exempted from last year’s overhaul of a landmark environmental law. Read more by Alejandra Reyes-Velarde of CalMatters.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Kash Patel’s push against California Rep. Swwell raises concerns in the FBI // The Washington Post

CA farmers were already struggling. Then came the war in Iran // Los Angeles Times

Kaiser earned $9.3 billion last year. Critics say he has strayed from his charitable mission // Los Angeles Times

How rising gas prices are changing the math to own an EV in CA // San Francisco Chronicle

After stopping viral SFOcity ​​moves to require SFPD to identify federal agents // The San Francisco Standard

Governor Newsom issues ‘final warning’ to cities for housing violations – only one is in the Bay Area // The Mercury News

“No Kings” protests. drew huge crowds in the Bay Area // KQED

No Kings brought out protesters in the LA region; 75 Arrests Made in Downtown LA // LAist

San Diego is losing population due to a sharp decline in immigration. What are the consequences? // San Diego Union Tribune

Lynn La is a newsletter writer for CalMatters, which focuses on the top political, policy and Capitol stories in California each weekday. She produces and curates WhatMatters, CalMatters’ flagship daily newsletter…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *