ArXiv will ban researchers who upload research papers full of AI

Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as the author of a research article, each author assumes full responsibility for all of its contents, regardless of how the contents were created.

If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and this output is included in scholarly works, it is the responsibility of the author(s).

We have recently clarified our penalties for this. If the submission contains indisputable evidence that the authors did not verify the results of the LLM construction, then we cannot trust anything in the paper.

The penalty is a one-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions be first accepted in a reputable, peer-reviewed venue.

Examples of incontrovertible evidence: hallucinogenic references, descriptive comments from LLM (“This is a 200-word summary; do you want me to make any changes?”; “The data in this table are illustrative, fill in with real numbers from your experiences”)