Tiktok’s deal raises more questions than answers

After months of delay, President Donald Trump He fell Executive order is supposed to “save” Tiktok. Trump claims that the deal will make the “America run” application, and it meets the law of mercy or dairy that threatened the existence of the application owned in China in the United States. However, the Trump administration has not revealed any information about the American Tijook operations, or the amount of what they will have. Questions remain about whether the new agreement – and the steps taken to get there – are legal.

“The story of Tijk is the most clear expression, one is a more vital example of the chaos of this administration, and the imperial imagination of itself as above the rule of law,” says Alan Rosenchin, a law professor at the University of Minnesota Law Faculty. freedom. During an interview, Rozenshtein calls for questioning Trump’s repeated extensions that prompted the Tiktok Ban Act.

“The president was alleged to extend the time that he had no authority to extend,” says Rosenastein. “What was he doing in reality was not to do his work and give himself strange final dates for 90 days to do his work again.”

Since the law that banned Tiktok entered into January, Trump has fell four times, with Newest The deadline giving Tiktok until December 16 to conclude a deal with American companies. Some argue The repeated delay violates the “caring” item of the United States constitution, which states that the president “warns against the implementation of laws honestly.” Instead of law enforcement, whether it prefers it or not, Trump spent months kicking the box on the road.

Place the uncertainty surrounding the legal position of Tiktok companies such as Google, Apple and Oracle in a strange position, where it is technically illegal to continue to distribute Tiktok to their application stores and host the application to their servers. “The largest companies in America are similar to this, knowing very well that this was illegal,” says Rostenastein.

He adds that these companies offer themselves “brutal blackmail” by the Trump administration. The Ministry of Justice is likely to follow, while under Trump’s leadership or future management companies to violate the ban, although the agency reassured it. They have in writing They will not take responsibility for re -Tiktok online.

Rozenshtein does not think it is realistic that future management takes action against Apple, Google or Oracle, who is believed to have played a role in their decision to communicate with Trump’s ongoing attachments. “I think this is the account, which may have – expected – the right account, but it is terrible for the rule of law.”

It is still not clear companies to control US Tiktok operations, however Report from CNBC Abu Dhabi, based in Abu Dhabi, is suggested controlling about 45 percent of Tiktok in the United States, while investors get 35 percent. China nor BYTEDACE did not make a public deal, although Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping gave “green light” to move forward.

The requirements stipulated in the executive order are also muddy. As Rozenshtein indicated, it states that the new Tiktok owners will control the application code, algorithms, and content baptism decisions, noting that there will be “intensive monitoring of software updates, algorithms, and data flows” by security partners in the United States. “Intensive monitoring” is completely meaningful if by atteedance controls the Tiktok algorithm.

However, it is likely to be some time until anything is finished. On Thursday, a White House official said Trump is likely to pay the final date for another 120 days to sort paperwork and organizational approvals, According to CNN. Until then, Trump – and companies that distribute the Tiktok app – will remain on a fragile legal basis. “The threat of national security comes from inside the house these days, much more than what comes from China,” says Rostenastein.

More than a year has passed since Congress announced that Tiktok is a threat to national security, and it has not come out of that. There were no noticeable changes to the application, unlike More than 1 billion dollars It has been spent to direct US user data to US -based servers (which Get before Even the law entered into force). Now, all that remains we have is a deal that may not be satisfied with even the law of disposal or dairy, as well as a completely new ignorance of the law.