“The proposed Google changes from the Ministry of Justice” undermine the user’s confidence in depth. “

The government’s proposal to make Google shares its search data with competitors “undermines the user’s deep confidence” by putting inquiries in the hands of their lowest competitors, and Elizabeth Reed, the company’s research president, witnessed on Tuesday.

the The Ministry of Justice proposed forcing Google Let’s supervise classification signals and other research data for competitors, there is something that he says will lead to the level of the stadium and the end Google search monopoly. But Reed argued that exporting this data would shake the belief of users that their search operations will remain in particular, and that their value will create an incentive for infiltrators to pursue young competitors. “Once it is delivered to a qualified competitor, there is no other protection that we can provide,” she said. “The start starting is not a goal in general because it is small, but now it has this huge treasure of data.”

Google fights full doj suggestions, which also include Forcing her to sell the chrome browserBy arguing to obtain more limited changes in research distribution contracts (plans to appeal the referee, but he cannot do this until Judge Amit Mihitt issues the therapy decision). Red Certificate follows the certificate of other executives, Including CEO Sondar PachayHe claimed that government proposals can significantly change Google and the largest network. The Ministry of Justice says that its proposals are all necessary to restore competition to the search market, and Google is said to exaggerate its terrible effects.

Reid said that the delivery of information that runs Google’s search will not only make its competitors goals for hacking, but may also undermine confidence in Google products and search on a wider scale. Today, many people resort to Google to ask questions that they may not feel comfortable even asking them to a friend. “If they suddenly feel anxious that the data may go to another place … they may decide not to use Google completely, (or) they may decide that they will not search for certain categories.” During its condition, in contrast, the Ministry of Justice brought a privacy expert that the research information can be shared safely with certain protection in its place.

Reid Certificate from Bishy last week repeated that the government’s data exchange proposals can help competitors or random mail senders to “reverse” their systems, which makes it easier for them to obtain unwanted messages or wrong information in Google’s results. She said that fighting these bad actors “is always the game of cat and mouse, but suddenly it becomes a cat and mouse game as your hands are associated behind your back.”

Building the tools needed to follow the government’s proposals that would transform engineering talents towards the work of hard compliance instead of innovation, Reid continued. It saw that more than 20 percent of the research engineering force will need to focus on compliance “because it is very wide and gas. Even the additional changes on small features may lead to additional steps, so Google is likely to convert their focus into “less coverage by treatments because this is where we can stand out”, although it has not been included in details.

Moreover, Reid said that maintaining the tools needed to distribute all the information the Ministry of Justice wants to share with competitors will slow down its ability to charge the features that improve user search experiences. “It is just a great deal of work because these units are constantly changing,” Reid said. “The work value for formation for the cost only does not work.”