The lawsuit says that Google’s “misconduct” undermines publishers who create content.

Penske Media, which has publications including Rolling Stone, Variety and Billboard Google’s prosecutionOn the pretext that the research giant illegally uses its content and the content of other publishers to fill an overview of artificial intelligence that has become a basic player in the upper part of the Google Research Results.

In a lawsuit filed on Friday at the US boycott court of Colombia, Pinkki argues that Google’s “misconduct” by monopolizing online search has forced publishers to eliminate the embezzlement of their contents, transfer readers away from the publishers sites and deny them the ability to obtain funds from the content created by journalists.

“It is reasonable to go to Google’s forced entry to the online publishing market to decrease traffic to other publishers over the Internet, and less revenue for publishers via the Internet who are already born their own content, and as a result, the lowest online publishing content for consumers,” says Bensky’s complaint.

In 2024, the provincial court ruled itself Google illegally protects the research monopoly. Earlier this month, Judge Amit Mihit issued Find the punishment In this case, the company should share some search data with competitors.

On Monday, Google returned to a lawsuit against Penske, saying it provides a valuable service.

“Every day, Google sends billions of clicks to the web sites, and sends an overview of Amnesty International traffic to a variety of locations,” said Jose Castaneda, Google Policy Director, said. “We will defend these indisputable claims.”

Pinkki did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company also publishes The Hollywood Reporter, Indiewire, WWD (Women’s Wear Daily), ARTNEWS, Artforum and others.

For decades, there was a mutual relationship between publishers online and Google. By indexing on the Internet, the search giant can provide updated information related to people’s information. In exchange for allowing Google – which gets about 90 % of the search market – their sites crawl, and publishers get traffic through these search results, as long as people have a reason to click.

Do not miss any non -biased technology content and laboratory -based reviews. Add cnet As a favorite Google source.

With the emergence Tructering tools Like ChatGPT from Openai and Jimini, however, this relationship changes. Instead of having to spend time searching for lists of links, then reading a selection of articles and web pages, you can get a precisely made of seconds that combine information from artificial and direct intelligence tools training data.

A wide range of publishers and authors claimed that artificial intelligence companies trained artificial intelligence models without a suitable license and benefit from high -quality human -making content. For this reason, some sued Openai, confused, anthropor, Microsoft and Google. (Disclosure: Zif Davis, the parent company CNET, filed a lawsuit against Openai, claimed that it had violated the copyright of ZifF Davis in training and operating artificial intelligence systems.)

At the same time, the data shows that the more an artificial intelligence look at the research, there is a A noticeable decrease in the click rate To the source material. Google claims that artificial intelligence sends.High -quality clicks“To the sites, which means that these visitors stay in those sites for a longer period with more post.

Penske’s results may have great effects on publishers and artificial intelligence companies, including Google.

“If he wins your Pink, this is likely to lead to platforms that need to negotiate licensing deals with publishers in order to have the right to include summaries in search features or an overview,” he said. Robert RosenbergA partner in intellectual property in Musa Singer, a New York -based company.

Rosenberg said the ruling may also dictate what is considered “transformative” – ​​that is, not to protect copyrights – or may lead to more regulatory pressure on Google. “This condition highlights how dominant platforms impose their own conditions because of their scale.”