Take it down the heads to the Trump office

Take It Download is heading to President Donald Trump’s office after the House of Representatives voted at 409-2 to pass the bill, which will require social media companies to download the content that was marked as uniform sexual images (including artificial intelligence). Trump Pledge.

The bill is among the only pieces of online safety legislation To pass both councils successfully In years of anger on deep and the safety of the child and others Content Administration or its allies hate. It criminalizes the publication of unusual intimate images (NCII), whether real or created on the computer, and requires that social media platforms have a system to remove those images within 48 hours of marking. In his speech to Congress this year, Trump He mocked that as soon as he signed“I will use this bill for myself as well, if you don’t mind, because no one is treated worse on the Internet, no one.”

The spread of artificial intelligence tools that make it easier than ever generating realistic images that have highly shipping concerns about devastating and devastating content Publication through schools Creating a new vector of bullying and abuse. But while critics say this is an important issue to deal with it, they are concerned that the approach of a law that it takes can be used to harm in other ways.

The CIA Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI), which was created to combat sexual assault, said it could not chant the phrase ACT. “While we welcome federal criminalization for a long time for NDII (uninterrupted distribution of intimate images), we regret that they are associated with providing very accidental sources for misuse and are likely to be inverse to the victims.” It is afraid that the bill, which enables the Federal Trade Committee – that Trump, the Democratic Minority Commission It was launched in a break with contracts from the precedent of the Supreme Court It will be selectively imposed in a way that does not eventually support “inevitable platforms.”

“The platforms that feel confident that it is unlikely to target FTC (for example, the platforms that are closely compatible with the current administration may feel the renewal of NDII reports simply,” they write. “The platforms that try to identify the original complaints may face a sea of ​​wrong reports that can overwhelm their efforts and expose their ability to work at all.”

Because of the rapid transformation of platforms to remove the content that has been marked as an intimate intimate images, the Electronic Border Foundation (EFF) It warns of specially smaller platforms “They will have to comply quickly to avoid legal risks so that they will not be able to check the claims.” Instead, they are likely to resort to defective liquidation factors to suppress the repetitions, they write. The group also warns that encrypted services from end to end, including private correspondence systems and cloud storage are not exempted from the bill, which poses a threat to privacy technique. Since encrypted services cannot monitor what their users send to each other, EFF asks, “How can these services comply with the removal requests that have been assigned in this law? Platforms may respond by abandoning the entire encryption so that you can monitor content – convert private conversations into expected spaces”, including the survivors who generally take them.

However, the Act The Take Download got a wide support. First Lady Melania Trump has become a leading champion of the bill, but it is also seen as supporting parents and youth, as well as some in the technology industry. Head of Global Affairs at Google Kent Walker Call “A big step towards protecting individuals from expanded frank images,” and Snap Likewise, voting applauded. The Internet, a group whose members include medium -sized companies such as Discord, ETSY, Reddit, Roblox and others, praised the vote of the House of Representatives, with CEO Peter Chandler says that the draft law “will enable victims to remove NCII materials from the Internet and end the abuse cycle by those who publish this huge content.”
Representative Thomas Massi (RK), one of the two members (both of whom are Republican) voted against the bill, Books on x He could not support him because “I feel that this is a slippery slope, mature for misuse, with unintended consequences.”