“It is very difficult to build”: this is the initiative of the California Democrat to accelerate construction

Read this story in English

The California legislator wants to resolve the crisis of state housing, to strengthen its economy, to fight climate change and to save the Democratic Party with a “terribly sexy” idea.

Oakland’s Democratic Assemblyman, Buffy Wicks, Considers That The Slow, Sometimes Redundant Process often Litigious to Achieve The Approval of Federal, State and Local Goverments forrs Most Urgent Problems of California, from Dwelling to Water y public transport and Climate changeS

Last year Wicks directed a Choose a committee Of the “permit reform”, a general term for accelerating the government review at all stages of the development of a project, not only its literal permits. The Committee has taken A A research mission that has toured several states And he testifies to experts, builders and defenders why it has been built so long for the construction of apartments, wind power plants, water storage systems and public transport to name some types of famous slowly and desperately necessary projects.

This committee today publishes his Final reportS According to Wix, the summary is that “it is very difficult to build something in California.”

The report stresses the need for the state to build Millions of new residential units and loaders for electric vehicles; thousands of miles of public transport; projects for straightening sushi, floods and elevated sea level; and projects for renewable energy “built and interconnected to rhythm three times higher than historical ones.”

Although it is not likely that the technical analysis loaded with jargon will become viral, the report prepares the land for what may be one of the legislative battles next year. Wicks said the legislators in both cameras work on 20 bills of obstacles for housing permit only. It is also reported that other accounts are preparing to accelerate the approvals of transport, clean energy and water projects.

Legislators periodically approve unique bills aimed at facilitating the construction of preferred projects. Almost all legislative sessions of the last decade have observed at least a handful of “rationalization” for high -density homes.

This political moment can be the script of something more big, Wix said. In Capitol, an aggressive mood seems to reduce bureaucratic procedures. More employees in California, Especially in Los Angeles and especially after the forest fires of January They want to review how building permits are obtained.

President Trump’s clear, albeit modest, election victory in November, elevated by a wave of public anger for the inflation of the Biden era, has pushed many Democrats to reorient their political platforms to issues related to living costs.

Assembly President Robert Rivas, Salinas Democrat, began this year’s legislative session summons Let’s look at every bill in terms of accessibility. Gavard Gavin Newpom more recently admitted “California’s inability to Get out of your own path ”in big and important projects. Last Saturday He stopped some environmental provisions for fire prevention projects.

In California and across the country, simultaneous climate and residential crises are convinced Of many legislators and Commentators politicians of the democratic tendency to prioritize the construction of many things: apartments buildings, electric vehicle stations, electric transmission lines, solar and wind power plants, railways and bus networks. The faster, the better.

The catastrophic fires that Los Angeles beat in January stressed how difficult the reconstruction could be. NEWSOM indicated how Your primary priority Reducing environmental norms and accelerating the processes of granting rights and permits in burned areas.

In Sacramento, a new group of state legislators, chosen partly by the fierce voters and who have not suffered past legislative battles after changes in the permits, can recently be receptive and make major changes.

“I think everything it combines is a unique opportunity for us to really make a very significant change,” Wix said.

The report itself does not offer accurate recommendations, but its analysis is often significantly specific and offers clues for the changes that legislators may expect to discuss this spring.

Described as “reform options”, these are Wicks words, often “extremely unattractive.” For example, the report shows that legislators may be more specific when a particular type of housing application is considered “complete” to protect future legal changes. Another “opportunity”: allow external experts They approve of project plans.

Current policies, which could serve as a regulatory renewal model, according to the report, include reinforcement from the state of complementary housing units, stations for loading electric vehicles and certain environmental restoration projects.

But these “success stories” share a feature that points to what may be the most reflective aspect of the next legislative package. The three were released from the California Environment Act, the 1970 Law, which requires governments to study and publish the results of the environmental impact from any decision they take, including the approval of new residential, transport or energy projects.

The law that is pronounced “See-ti” is one of the most discussed in California policy. Opponents claim that the law is usually abducted by special interest groups, as property owners who do not want to leave the park or organized unions, to paralyze projects for obvious reasons for a non -environmental environment. They indicate high -ranking court battles as examples of law abuse, in this case Resolved by the Supreme Court of the State last year In which Berkli’s neighborhood groups claim that the noise expected to come from the homes of university students is a pollutant according to the law.

“If we want to achieve our goals in climate change, it is necessary to reform CEQA,” Wix said. “If we want to achieve our housing goals, we need to reform CEQA.”

Defenders of the law say that it is vital for the discussion, public participation and transparency, preventing local and state governments and developers to be guided by vulnerable communities.

“Sometimes for vulnerable communities, law is the only instrument that has a place in the decision -making table,” says JP Rose, director of policies at the Center for Biodiversity. “Ignoring all this and says” This is just giving permits “it seems to me the wrong way to deal with this problem.”

Legislators usually include specific exceptions to the law, but historically, making common changes to the CEQA is a difficult task in Sacramento. Two years ago, Newsom presented plans to review the law in order to Speed ​​up the approval of large infrastructure projectsS Many of his most ambitious offers They were on the sidelinesS Last year, the legislature tried to ran a bill aimed at starting more quickly Pure energy projects ( Failed ).

“At that time, there are too many options in the process to put a brake on the gears.”

Buffy Wicks, Oakland Assembly

Probably legislators spend a lot of time discussing the law, no matter what happens to the permit package. InvoiceAlready printed by the democratic senator of San Francisco Scott Wiener, it will make it easier for urban housing projects to be released from law and that local and state governments avoid having to carry out full environmental evaluations for every aspect of each project. The Senator called “The Fast and Focused Law of Seka”.

Rose, from the Center for Biodiversity, said the bill “triggering a rifle to the heart of CEQA”.

Carter Rubin, a defender of public transport of the Defense Council of Natural Resources, which testified to the selection committee last year, said there should be a difference between the way regulators reviewed projects that help to achieve the residential and climate goals of the state and those who strongly do not.

“We would undoubtedly support the rationalization of the expansion of highways or the scattered urban development that affects ecosystems,” he said in a telephone interview. “It is very important that the legislature focuses on projects that are worth moving, not only on ready -to -do projects.”

Wicks said he would present CEQA’s Housing Bill as part of the total package.

“At that time, there are too many opportunities in the process to put obstacles to gears,” he said. “If we do not solve this problem, Democrats will pay a price in the future.”

This article was originally published by CalmattersS