It appears that the Justice Department made a mistake in redacting the Epstein files

The Ministry of Justice has He blamed its delayed release Some of the so-called Epstein Files argue that more time is needed to redact sensitive information, such as details identifying victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But at least some of the redactions published so far appear to be mistakenly revealing information that was supposed to be withheld from the public.

A complaint filed by the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2022 seeking damages from Epstein’s estate to the “Epstein Library” was posted on the Justice Department’s website with several redactions throughout, Techdirt founder Mike Masnick, among others, said. Shared on platforms like Bluesky. But simply copying and pasting several edits into a new document reveals what’s underneath the black boxes. The method reveals details such as that a co-executor signed checks worth more than $400,000 from Epstein’s foundation “paid to young models and actresses, including a former Russian model.” It also reveals that one of the co-executors had signed a founding check with the former model’s last name in the memo line to the immigration attorney “who was involved in one or more forced marriages arranged between Epstein’s victims to secure the victim’s immigration status.” It also reveals details about an alleged victim in the complaint.

At least one port, Drop website newsIt also appears to be able to guess the URL of files that don’t exist on the website yet By extrapolating the figure. Wired I later found that the link appeared to be broken.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment Edge About accidents.

Ministry of Justice Remove image Among the files are photos of President Donald Trump among other framed photos of prominent figures including the Pope and former President Bill Clinton, before they were recovered on Saturday after a backlash. Agency He said on X It “temporarily removed” it for review after the Southern District of New York flagged it “for potential further action to protect victims.” The Justice Department said it returned the photo unchanged after determining there was no evidence of victims in the photo.