I know why Mark Zuckerberg risked directly

On Wednesday evening, I had a deep feeling of Déjà vu. When I saw Mark Zuckerberg opens its Meta Connect key By giving the world a live tour behind the scenes of its new glassesI was transferred again to 2012.

I was in the direct audience at Google I/O when Sergey Brin presented the world to some friends about to jump from the balloon, higher than the event. I watched, Agape, while the athletes took a dove across the sky, fired bicycles across the surface, raised on the side of the Moscow Center in San Francisco, then stole on the stage directly – all of that while broadcast live from its Google glass headphones.

We have not seen anything like him before – or since then. “Google wins the internet with a live pilot show from Google Glass,” Declare Techcrunch. “Google One-Ups Keynotes from Apple,” books Atlantic Ocean. (Our address was A little more reserved))

It is clearly missing energy from the launch of the products since then the Covid-19s, when the Apple began to convert its keys that were once isolated into pre-recorded videos from 60 or 90 minutes very polished. There is an excitement in knowing that something is real, which can be illustrated offers Fail. Even if the illustration fails, it is not always bad! It enhances the idea Everything else You see real.

But if there is an opportunity to whisk, it must be ready For failure. The illustrations should be sufficiently cold to really dazzle if you already pull them. Or at least, the reward and risks must be aligned.

In Meta Connect, it was immediately clear that Zuck was trying to bring at least energy of the same energy of anything that Google offered in 2012, and now after he presented the first group of outstanding glasses with a screen since Google itself.

with Apple has criticized Amnesty International over the past few yearsGoogle declined somewhat from the living risks after making artificial intelligence Realistic errors in illustrationsWill it be great for Meta to look more courageous and smarter than her competitors? Get logic.

But Zuke was not ready to fail.

Try Zouk again and again And again To answer a video call to glasses to Glasses from Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth-which can be unreliable in an unknown way even with the videos that have been fully released, which is much lower than the stage of the stage. This is although the reward, if it succeeds, will only be a simple offer for wireless video connection technology throughout the ages.

Earlier, the chef Jacques Mankoso brought to show how dead glasses could help him move a “Korean Meat Smile sauce” by analyzing the ingredients in front of him and walking through a recipe-only to the sound of artificial intelligence Part The recipe and leave it hateful, repeat the line “What do I do first?” Over and over again.

Then, he and Zuke were rising to blame the failure on Wi-fiAs if the complete lack of communication could have been deceived by glasses to believe that he had already cut green onions and put them in a bowl. ((It was not wi-fiAnd every technician watches the keyword I knew that; Usually, vocal assistants stop talking at all when they lose contact.)

It became clear later that Zuke was wandering in some additional nonsense by pretending to think about a “Korean Slide Sluna” to try to chef Koso. My cityJohn Walker:

The bottles called “sesame oil” and “soy sauce”, with the words facing the camera directly, sit next to-my God, will you look at this-a jerk of brand spices! There are also some spring onions, two lemon, two garlic cloves, salt, pepper and possibly potatoes and a bottle of honey? Everything is very sad. So, Meta AI, what can we maybe Do?

However, the illustration was not necessarily the product of Meta, at least if you are watching the entire keyword. For me, I made hiccups more Impressive when experimental shows have already worked. I spent less time thinking about how Meta could be completely fake This thing is where Zuck is destroyed by an invisible message With him New nervous wrist From what I would do otherwise, and more time he likes the illustration where the glasses The illustrative name is what people say in real timeIn front of your eyes directly.

When Bose I apologized for flying controls during this illustration showI thought: Oh, this is real! There, the result was cold enough to risk and reward.

Zuck Blame Wi-Fi, and try again and again to get a pilot offer, remind me that time that Steve Jobs blamed Wi-Fi His apple width failed in 2010. He was trying to browse New York Times On the new iPhone 4, it will not be loaded.

Like Zuck, Jobs did not also plan to fail at the time: instead, soon stopped the entire keyword and told a room full of journalists that they had to turn off 570 Wi-Fi hot points that they apparently brought to the room.

“All the bloggers need to turn off your basic stations, stop Wi-Fi, and every notebook, put on the ground,” then decided (then asked more politely).

But there was a way to crazy. The jobs really had a good reason to completely disable the keyword.

Twenty minutes later, after additional wireless offers, Steve Jobs said he had Another thing To participate – the first video call between iPhone was held, the first general demonstration From FaceTime. This is when video communication technology was still new (despite its existence). The reward was worth risking.

Skydive if you are going to get the world to say that you got the best technical show ever; Tell a room full of journalists to turn off hot points if you are going to make the first iPhone video call. Don’t worry about a little hiccup: due to Jobs’s failure earlier, there was no doubt in 2010 that FaceTime was real. But if your best is a trial of semi -cooked cooking and last Video call, be ready to go forward.

I hope we can return to direct illustrations again. Most people who want to sit through technology keys understand that software is difficult, hardware is more difficult, and fails! For many of us, the failures show that your product TRUE. While artificial intelligence, smoking and smoke became the base, knowing that something real is more valuable than ever.