Google divides that it does not destroy the web by searching for artificial intelligence

Google says the features of searching for artificial intelligence are not a traffic movement on the location of the tanks despite the recent reports indicating otherwise. in Blog published on WednesdayLiz Reid, President of Search Google Liz Reid, says that the click of the search engine has been “relatively stable” compared to the same time last year – although some types of websites get more clicks and others get less.

The argument of Red that artificial intelligence helps in fact the web comes after just weeks PEW Research published a report However, people are “less likely” to click on links when Google provides them with an artificial intelligence overview, or the summary created of artificial intelligence and which appears at the top of the research. In its post, Reid says that Google results contradict the reports of the third party, which “often depends on defective methodologies.”

Recent changes on Google’s research have sent ripples throughout the digital media industry. accident Report from Wall Street Magazine How to join how Business Insiderand the Washington PostAnd HuffPost It faced a decrease in traffic in the aftermath Employee definition. Moreover, the transformations in Google algorithms led Independent web sites struggle To stay in the search results.

Changing the search patterns led to “low traffic to some sites and increasing traffic to others”, with web sites that contain forums, videos, podcasts and “original sounds” that benefit more than others, according to ReID. Users are likely to visit sites that contain in -depth reviews, original posts or studied analyzes. “We continue to send billions of clicks to web sites every day and we believe that the exchange value of the search with the web is still strong,” says Reed.

RIID adds that although some users may not click on the testimonies of an artificial intelligence overview, people who click through may spend more time on the website to learn more on a topic. “Amnesty International’s response may provide the Earth’s status, but people click on diving deeper and learn more, and when they do it, these clicks are more valuable,” says Reid.