Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Nintendo settled the lawsuit filed against the Genki accessory maker on Switch 2 Mockup, which he presented in CES before the formal control unit was disclosed, and the accessories it promoted using Switch 2. The parent company Genki, Things, Nintendo will pay an unknown amount of money in damage to closing the case, according to Legal deposit was submitted on MondayHe agreed to stop giving the names of its “confusing similar” products to the official intellectual intellectual property.
The conflict began in January after Jenky showed accurate Switch 2D print 2 Mockup In CES, even including the control unit logo, days before it was officially launched by Nintendo. The company also started promoting a set of Switch 2 accessories before announcing the console.
Nintendo later I filed a complaint Against the accessory maker in May due to “violating brands, unfair competition, and wrong advertisement.” Nintendo said it did not provide Genki with Switch 2 technical specifications, and claimed that Genki either “happened illegally or illegally on Nintendo Switch 2” before the general release of the console, or “it cannot demand compatibility with enough certainty to submit advertising claims in good faith.”
The financial conditions of the settlement have not been revealed. According to the settlement deposit, GENKI is witnessing that “he did not get access to a key 2 before announcing the release of the console, and the assets of the 3D printed doll unit are still unclear.
In the original case file, Nintendo said that Genki has also violated its brand by marketing third -party accessories and services using the language that referred to IP in Nintendo, such as “Genki Direct” and “Genki Glitch 2.” Nintendo Jenke accused “of benefiting from the confidence and loyalty that the Nintendo fans possess the brand and the brand in Nintendo and cause practical harm.”
Genki is still allowed to refer to the Nintendo brand in its “nominal use” method under the new settlement agreement, but only when the company submitted compatible claims verified or clarify its affiliation to Nintendo products as an external authority.