California Deadly Power Bill attracts the speed of gop

Los Angeles Asamblem Rick Znsod He says he wants to narrow the standards of justified murder. Critics say he wants to make self -defense illegal.

Assembly Bill 1333 It caused a great debate after its introduction in late February.

In response to “ground laws of several countries” that allow people to use deadly force in self -defense in some cases, the AMS bill seeks to codify certain circumstances when the murder “is not justified”. These circumstances will include when the person is:

• Outside their home, she knew that the use of deadly force could be avoided by safely withdrawing;
• Engaging in a mutual battle or deliberate provocation of a person (although this provision has some exceptions).

Zedo, Democrat, told me that his proposal did not move with the “castle for the castle” in California, which allows people to use deadly power to protect themselves in their own home. More strives to deal with violence with a gun and growing armed vigilance in the US

• Save: “What this bill is focused on is someone who goes out to the public-raises battle-when the victim responds, they shoot them and claim self-defense.”

There is evidence – including a 2020 study of the research and political cerebral trust Rand Corporation and analysis of 2022 from Oxford University -This connection to ground laws with Increasing the killing of a firearmS

The Bill Would Be Similar to Laws Enacted in Nearly A dozen States, Including Nebraska, Minnesota and Hawaii, Which Require to “Diseng or Deescalate” in Lieu of Taking Senior Vice President for Government Affairs For Everytown for the safety of the pistolSponsor of the measure.

However, the Republicans rammed the proposal: David Tangipa Fresho told me that the bill was on the second amendment and that it would allow the state to punish the victims if it does not “exhaust all the options” and will act in the “parameters of what the state wants to do”.

• Tonga: “We have situations in which the police must react right now and these are trained persons. We now ask people who are untouched to make decisions that could cost their lives. … It doesn’t matter to (Bill) intentions, these are the consequences at the end of the road. “

Assembly Tom Lakay From Palmdale, a former officer of the California highway patrol, he called the proposal “ridiculous, dangerous and deplorable.”

Zshur said he was adding more “nuanced language” to the measure. The bill has not yet been defined.