Apple sets warnings on European Union applications that do not use the application store payments

Apple tries to bend Europeans from using iOS applications that support alternative payment options by making them look scary. BoldMonitor John Gropuber The icon of the red wondering mark is shown prominently on List of applications for attritionAlong with messaging users that it does not use Apple’s special payment and “special payment system”.

Instacar, a three -year -old Hungarian application to check the number of kilometers and the value of used cars, is not available in the application store in the United States. But in Hungary, in the European Union, it was listed as one of the five best applications in the business category, with thousands of positive reviews – not a model service that would increase caution. The only GRIPE that seems to Apple is that Instacar uses an external payment system, and that the applications for the application store such as purchase, family sharing and unified subscription management will not be available in such purchases.

“When you create an account on the external website of the developer, you may have to provide personal information, including payment information, directly to the developer or third -party partners,” Apple says on the support page Associated with the warning message. “You will trust the developer, as well as any partners and providers of payment services you are working with, to deal with your information based on their privacy controls and safety.”

Apple is already facing the heat in the European Union for its practices about the scary tactics. In April, and The European Commission released preliminary results Apple “makes it very stressful and confusing” for users to install alternative application markets, a process that includes clicking on many fear leaves that ask users to confirm whether they want to follow.

This application store warning also appeared in the wake of recently Apple epic to rule Apple prevents restricting how developers are linked to alternative purchase systems. The noticeable requirements that were implemented to process Apple intimidation tactics were that the company could not interfere with consumers who choose to leave an application with anything that exceeds a “neutral message” about the direction to a third party, although this is a milestone that does not apply outside the United States.