An epic is asking the judge to make Apple let Fortnite return to the US App Store

EPIC Country Judge EPIC Johnzalez Rogers requests Apple to review – and agree to whether it is compatible with Apple instructions – submit EPIC to Fortnite To the application store in the United States in a Presentation of the new court. The company argues in the document that Apple is again in contempt for the judge April order Restricting them from refusing applications to use external payment links.

in A message from Apple This epic participated late on Friday, Apple writes that it “will not take action regarding the introduction of the Fortnite application even after the ninth department’s rules based on our suspended request for partial residence on the new podium.” The epic claims that the delay is the revenge of its legal battle with the company, and notes in its file that the Apple is “explicit and frequent”. The court told her that she would agree Fortnite If the application complies with Apple guidelines, which insists on its current presentation.

He claimed the saga because it cannot be launched in the European Union because of Apple Resolution to prevent its provision to the United States. Apple said it only requested to re -submit the application without including the American store interface, “so as not to affect Fortnite in other geographical areas.” But in After announcing his new introductionEmployed allegations that they have to make multiple versions of the application, which they say are against Apple’s guidelines.

EPIC requires that the court apply its uphide order, finding Apple in contempt again, and asking the company to “accept any compatible epic application, including FortniteFor distribution on the American store interface for the application store. “

Disadvantages here is that during this case, Judge Gonzalez Rogers did not go further FortniteBack to the store, and found in its ruling in 2021 that an epic is still In the intention of a developer agreement, it is a developer With apples. 9to5mac He writes The judge is likely to need to agree that Apple is again in contempt for the court, as it did in its ruling on April 30. The difference from time to time – and what can work for EPIC – is only How annoyed with Apple In the text of this ruling.

Apple did not respond immediately freedomRequest to comment.