Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth directed the Pentagon to classify Anthropics as “Supply chain risks“On Friday, it sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley and left many companies scrambling to understand whether they could continue using one of the industry’s technologies. Most popular Artificial intelligence models.
“As of now, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the U.S. military may conduct any business activity with Anthropic,” Hegseth wrote in a social media post.
The appointment comes weeks after Tense negotiations Between the Pentagon and Anthropic on how the US military will use the startup’s AI models. In a Blog post This week, Anthropic said its contracts with the Pentagon should not allow its technology to be used for mass domestic surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous weapons. The Pentagon asked Anthropic to agree to allow the US military to apply its AI to “all legitimate uses” without specific exceptions.
Identifying supply chain risks allows the Pentagon to restrict or exclude certain vendors from defense contracts if they are deemed to pose security vulnerabilities, such as risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence. Its purpose is to protect sensitive military systems and data from potential compromise.
Anthropy responded in another Blog post Friday evening, saying it would “challenge any supply chain risk classification in court,” and that such a classification “would set a dangerous precedent for any U.S. company negotiating with the government.”
Anthropic added that it has not received any direct communication from the Department of Defense or the White House regarding negotiations over the use of its AI models.
“Secretary Hegseth implied that this designation would prevent anyone doing business with the military from doing business with Anthropic. The Secretary does not have the legal authority to support this statement,” the company wrote.
The Pentagon declined to comment.
“This is the most shocking, most damaging, most impactful thing I’ve ever seen done by the U.S. government,” says Dean Paul, a senior fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation and a former senior adviser for AI policy at the White House. “We just imposed sanctions on an American company. If you’re an American, you should think about whether or not you should live here 10 years from now.”
People across Silicon Valley spoke on social media expressing similar shock and dismay. “The people running this administration are reckless and vindictive. I think that’s enough to explain their behavior,” said Paul Graham, founder of startup accelerator Y Combinator. He said.
Boaz Barak, a researcher at OpenAI, said: job “Kneeling at one of our leading AI companies is right about the worst goal we can make. I very much hope that cooler heads will prevail and that this announcement will be reversed.”
Meanwhile, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced Friday night that the company has reached an agreement with the Department of Defense to deploy its AI models in classified environments, apparently with cutbacks. “Two of our most important safety principles are the prohibition of domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including autonomous weapons systems,” Altman said. “The Department of Labor agrees to these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and places them in our agreement.”
Confused customers
In its blog post on Friday, Anthropic said the supply chain risk classification, under authority 10 USC 3252, applies only to DoD contracts directly with suppliers, and does not cover how contractors use Claude AI software to serve other customers.
Three federal contracting experts say it’s impossible at this point to determine which Anthropic customers, if any, should now cut ties with the company. Hegseth’s announcement “is not steeped in any law that we can speculate on at the moment,” says Alex Major, a partner at the law firm McCarter & English, which works with technology companies.