California’s new laws force chatbots to be more fed up for children


From Colin LeseronCalmness

""
A group representing technology companies ultimately supported the legislation, just signed by governor Gavin Newpom, imposing precautions against self -harm in chatbots. Child safety advocates supported a different bill. Students use computers in the classroom in Sacramento on May 11, 2022. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez -Jr., Calmatters

This story was originally published by CalmattersS Register about their ballots.

Governor Newsom announced today The fact that he has signed a Senate legislature, legislation that adds railings to the AI ​​chatbots that operate in the state.

The legislation divided representatives of the technology industry and child safety advocates. NEWSOM left an unsigned other bill regulating such bots, an assembly bill 1064, which the child’s defenders claimed better protected children.

According to SB 243, companies offering chatbots, such as Openai Chatgpt, will be needed to create specific precautions. Among them would be the requirements for monitoring chats for signs of suicidal idea and to take steps to prevent the harm of consumers, such as directing them to external help for mental health.

Chatbot creators will also be obliged to remind consumers that the answers are artificially generated and create “reasonable measures” to prevent children from seeing sexually explicit content when using bots. Children using bots would also be reminded of taking breaks.

The legislation, among the first in the nation to regulate chatbots, comes after a series of disturbing reports. Stories across the country have stressed how chatbots can seemingly misleadingor fails Take signs of suicidal ideaS Meta, the Facebook Mother Company, is confronted with the reverse response this year leakage Chatbot rules revealed that the company allowed its bots to make “sensual” conversations with children.

The SB 243 has been supported by a changing combination of supporters, with the technology industry group computer and the Communication Industry Association ultimately supported it. After initially opposing the legislation, the group said after change that “it would provide a more festive environment for children while not creating a ban on exceeding AI products.”

But children’s safety advocates, after initially supported the SB 243, fell into the legislation after these changes, stating that they have recognized too much to the technology industry. Two groups, technological supervision and healthy media, instead cast their support behind the AB 1064, stating that the bill “establishes critical provisions on the development and use of artificial intelligence systems that interact with children”.

According to AB 1064, chatbots will not be allowed without technology companies that show that they are “not intended” to harm a child, for example by promoting self -harm.

“We have seen some truly horrific and tragic examples of young people applied by unregulated technologies, and we will not stand up until companies continue without the necessary restrictions and accountability,” says Newsom in a statement declaring SB 243.

The statement did not mention any actions on AB 1064. The governor has a veto or signing a bill by the end of the day, although this is not stated, his service is unlikely to move on with this legislation.

This article was Originally Published on CalMatters and was reissued under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Noderivatives License.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *