California to let more people be careful if parents are deported

From Jean QuangCalmness

This story was originally published by CalmattersS Register about their ballots.

Gavard Gavin Newo on Sunday signed a bill allowing a wide range of relatives to intervene as taking care of the children if their parents are deported, a measure that caused a fiery storm of conservative criticism.

A assembly bill 495 They will also provide kindergarten providers to collect information about immigration for a child or their parents and allow parents to nominate a temporary legal guardian for their child in the family court.

“We make the record that we are standing next to our families and their right to retain our private information, maintain parental rights and help families prepare in the event of an emergency,” Newsom says in a press release.

This was one of several measures that democrats dominated this year in response to the aggressive deportation repression of the Trump administration in Los Angeles and California. Newsom, Democrat, signed some of these other accounts – Prohibition of immigration and customs executive agents to wear masks in the state and require schools and hospitals to require orders when employees – at a ceremony in LA last month.

He left AB 495 indefinitely for weeks, causing an intercession storm from immigrants rights to provide Newsom’s signature over intensive conservative activists. The governor announced his decision on the day before the end time of signing or vetoing over 800 legislators sent to his desk last month.

The most controversial aspect of the bill refers to an unclear, decade of an age called an affirmative declaration. Relatives of a child whose parents are temporarily unavailable and with whom the child lives can testify to being a child’s caregiver; The designation allows the adult to enroll the child to school, to take them to the doctor and agree to medical and dental care.

The new law will expand, which is allowed to sign the Declaration of the Culture, from more traditional definitions of relatives to every adult in the family who is “associated with the child through blood, adoption or affinity in the fifth degree of kinship”, which includes people like big aunts or cousins. Parents can be canceled The caregiver’s designation, which is intended to be a temporary agreement and does not give that person the arrest.

Proponents said that parents at risk of deportation should choose someone who trusts to take care of their children if ICE holds them. The expansion of which is eligible for the care form, they said, gives the parents of immigrants more opportunities, as there may be no close relatives in the country, but take advantage of strong relationships with enlarged family or informal communities.

The legislation was supported by the groups for the rights of immigrants and defenders of children as the Alliance for the rights of children and the first 5 California.

“I introduced this bill so that the children do not have to wonder what would happen to them if their parents were not able to take them from school,” a dispute by Bill Author’s author. Rodriguez CelesteDemocrat from Arleta, told a recent press conference.

Critics claim strangers can get custody

But Republicans, religious law activists and parental rights claim that the bill will instead endanger the children.

They claimed that this would allow strangers to sign the declaration and ask the child in their care. Hundreds of opponents appeared in Capitol, gathering to gather against the legislation organized by Pastor Jack Hibs from the chapel of Golgotha ​​Chino, Hils Megacher, who called it the “most dangerous bill we have seen” in Sacrato. Some of the outbreak stemmed from false claims that the bill would allow strangers to receive custody of children who are not associated.

Assembly member Carl Demeyo, Republican in San Diego, called the legislation “The dream of trafficking in people.”

In the email Greg Burton, Vice President of the California Family Council, he undertook the fact that parents may not be there when the declaration form was signed.

“What are the parental rights?” He wrote. “These rights are nothing if anyone else can claim them by simply signing a form.”

In the summer, Rodriguez reduced the legislation to exclude “non -lifting extended family members”, but it was not enough to extinguish the dispute. The legislation has passed on party lines.

Compared to a rather progressive legislative body, the governor has often positioned himself as a moderate force on the retention and protection of children who, who who who, who who, who who, who who, who who, who who, whom regularly gain Conservative activists and put the California Democrats in defense. In 2023, he vetoed a bill that would require the family court judges to consider the parent’s support for the transition of the child’s gender into arrest disputes.

At a press conference last week, when activists called on Newsom to sign the bill, Angelica Salas, CEO of the Human Immigrant Rights Coalition in Los Angeles, asked the governor “not to listen to lies, not to listen to all the other things that is being said of this bill.”

NEWSOM, announcing its decision, quietly acknowledged the dispute in a press message. He included statements that he said “corrected the record” on incorrect characteristics and stated that the new law did not change the fact that parental rights and legal guardianship should be resolved by the family court judges.

This article was Originally Published on CalMatters and was reissued under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Noderivatives License.