California tenants can avoid expulsion if social security is delayed

From Ryan SabalowCalmness

This story was originally published by CalmattersS Register about their ballots.

With the Trump administration again threatening mass shootings From federal officials, governor Gavin Newo must soon decide whether the landlords of California should accept the delay in social security benefits as an excuse not to expel tenants who are lagging for rent.

Earlier this month, the California legislature adopted Culver City Democratic Assembly Isaac Brians A assembly bill 246S The measure will give tenants legal protection in expulsion proceedings if their social security benefits are “terminated, delayed or reduced due to any fault of the tenant” and the federal problems made them miss.

Brian introduced the bill this spring in the middle of a turmoil over the President Donald Trump’s Ministry of Government’s campaign to reduce federal workforce and fears Republicans will reduce social security payments, which they did not do.

“It is confidence that if President Trump comes for our aunts and our grandparents and our siblings with disabilities, California will be there to protect them and will not allow them to slide into homelessness because their social security was cut off,” Brian told Brian The Senate Committee on Judiciary In July.

NEWSOM has not indicated whether it would sign the measure. Newsom spokesman Tara Galegos declined to comment. He has until October 13 to decide.

Recent developments in Washington, DCCOLD may put new pressure on Newsom to sign the legislation. The best employee of Trump’s federal budget, Rus Wutter, Send a note last week For the heads of federal agencies who tell them to start more mass dismissals to federal workers if the government is closed because the congress cannot accept a bill on costs. It is not clear what the proposed abbreviations of VOUGHT for the staff of the Social Security Administration would mean.

The democratic and republican members of the Congress are in the impasse under the bill to finance the government. Democrats require Republicans to recover billions of dollars federal health care, reduced Republicans earlier this year. The federal government could close Wednesday if they did not reach an agreement. Social security payments have not been interrupted during previous government exceptions.

But the threat of the administration from more abbreviations of staff may pose a separate threat.

This year, Dog has reduced approximately 12% of the social security administration’s workforce, contributing to the lag in field offices across the country. Customer Service Problems at Social Security offices still happen, The New York Times reported last week.

What does the Tenant Tenant Account mean in California

Rudely 6.5 million Californians receive social security benefits. It is unclear how many of the estimated 17 million tenants in California rely on rental payments.

But older people eligible for social security benefits are an increasingly large share of tenants. A company for exploration in the rental market calculated The fact that the number of elderly people in the United States has risen by 30% over the last decade, including an increase of 31% in the Los Angeles area and a 24% jump in the San Francisco Bay area.

In anticipation of the law, it will give tenants in a court expulsion, which results in the right to cite a delay in social security payments so that they are not expelled from their home or apartment.

If a tenant can prove that the federal government is to blame for delaying the benefits they use to pay rent, the court will have to stop the expulsion up to six months. Within 14 days after the recovery of social security benefits, the tenant will have to pay all past rental or come out with a “mutually contractual payment plan” with his landlord.

In anticipation of the law will be in force until January 20, 2029, on the day Trump leaves office from his second term.

Proponents include organizations that advocate for the poor and the disabled, such as the California Council of Blind and Disability Rights California.

“Due to the latest federal employees’ actions, including deep staff cuts and office closure, every government program is at risk,” including social security, Eric Harris of the rights of people with disabilities California California before legislatorsS

The influential labor organizations serve the International Union and the California Association of Teachers, which are strongly donated to legislators, also support the bill. The two employment groups and their partner unions have donated at least $ 27.9 million to legislators since 2015, according to CalMatters’ Database of digital democracyS

The opponents included the California Apartments and Construction Industries and the California Chamber of Commerce. In total, these three groups have donated at least $ 13.6 million to legislators since 2015, according to digital democracy.

Republicans and some Democrats are opposed

Debra Carlton of the California Apartment Association told the Senate Committee on the Judiciary In July, all leases of rent prevent “senior mom and pop mistress” from paying their mortgages on time.

Seni. Roger NiloA Republican representing the suburbs of Sacramento shared these concerns with his colleagues on the Judiciary Committee. He Also noted That “President Trump, both in his first term and in this term, has repeatedly said that he does not want to touch social security.”

“If the president is good for his word, this bill will do absolutely nothing,” ” Brian repliedS “But … the Californians cannot afford to trust this president. He has shown several times at the beginning of this administration that he is not good at his word.”

No Republicans vote for the bill as it breaks through the two chambers. Two Democrats were also obviously his and voted against the measure of their colleague – a rareness in California’s legislation. As CalMatters reportedDemocrats vote “no” on average less than 1% of the time.

Norwalk Democratic Sen. Bob Airletta Give the lonely democratic “no” vote for the measure of the Senate floor earlier this month. Then he did not explain his vote and a speaker did not return a message from Calmatters.

In the Assembly Democratic Member Anamari Avila Farias Concord also joined the Republicans, voting against him when she was in front of her house last time.

In an interview last week, Avila Faryas, a former custody of the California Housing Agency, said he was worried about “the unforeseen consequences of the bill.”

“There is a reverse side for business people to be owned by property,” she said. “They also have struggles when they are unable to fulfill their monthly duties.”

This article was Originally Published on CalMatters and was reissued under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Noderivatives License.