In Natcon, the Shaabawi right calls for the Holy War against great technology

If you want a sense of the current relationship between the right of technology and the population, you must sit in the hacking room on the first day of Natcon 5, the annual gathering of Maga Right Powerhouses. At the end of the afternoon on cultural wars (“The need for the championship”), Jeffrey Miller Microphone was delivered and began to reprimand a member of the committee: Shiam Sankar, chief technology official in Balnnir, responsible for the company’s efforts of artificial intelligence.

“I claim that the artificial intelligence industry does not overly interfere with the national province,” Miller said, referring to the basic ideology of the conference. Hours ago, Miller, a professor of psychology at the University of New Mexico, was at that stage for a committee called “artificial intelligence and American spirit”, called for populists to launch the literal holy war against the developers of artificial intelligence “as a betrayal of our types, traitors to our nation, our drawings to our faith, and threats of our children.” Now, he stared at the technician who has just gave a letter claiming that the founders of technology were heroic like the founding fathers, who are holy figures to Natcons. “To a large extent, global, secular, liberal, a human female. They explicitly want collective unemployment, and they are planning the UBI communism for its headquarters, and they look at the human species as” biological pre -prepared “, as they say, for the excellent artificial excellence.”

Sancar launched a quiet defense that benefited from the correct Naton vocabulary (“I think that secular culture is widely in the Silicon Valley has filled the hole in the form of God in its heart with this belief towards AGI.”) But during the next few days, Sankar seemed to be one of a few of the attendees with a positive and pure and AI. Natcon was the home of the intellectual right that dominates the government of Donald Trump – if you threw a rock in a Westin hotel, you had a great opportunity to strike a person who contributed to the 2025 project – and it seems that there are two topics in the minds of everyone in that week: The imminent end to support the right to IsraelThe existential threat of technology to Western civilization.

The technological right and residents Maga were briefly united to enter Trump’s control of roofs in the White House, and since their alliance was broken, Vice Vice President JD Vance, Peter Thiel Protege who attended Natcon several times, tried to serve as a bridge between them. But this year Natcon explained that the factions are no longer on the same page.

Almost half of the conference paintings focus explicitly on technology. Technology is atrophy of their children’s brains in school and destroying critical thought in universities. Technology weakens the American economy, technology weakens national defense and international domination, assaulting technology Jewish Christian faith and destroying humanity.

Their hostility varied violently: Some admitted that artificial intelligence did not escape from that and it could be some Community benefit if it is harnessed properly, while others claimed that further development of artificial intelligence would lead to “civilized suicide”. But almost all speakers expressed deep doubts against the technology industry.

Even the threat of Chinese AI’s dominance was not enough for their influence, and the fact that Trump himself had signed funding projects like Stargate. “The logical basis of the state is to accelerate artificial intelligence completely explicit on this topic:” We must overcome China and grow the economy. “This, of course, has great effects on the future More happier for your children and grandchildren. “

Trump’s allies were also saying this in Natcoun, from Steve Bannon to Josh Holie to Mike Benz. Even senior administration officials placed in great technology: Dr. Jay Bahtasharia, who were extracted for their interrogation in Covid’s assets and were later appointed by Trump to lead the National Health Institutes, that technology companies that are “controlled” have returned scientific progress.

Dean Paul, a former politics advisor, said this hostility was collapsing for years on the right, said Diane Paul, a former senior political advisor in artificial intelligence and the emerging technology at the White House Trump, who also spoke in Natcon 5. freedom“The technology industry was compatible with conservatives to silence conservative ideas.” A partial list of Big Tech Crime: The Future of the algorithm, TWTTER, Satania, Section 230, Calculate “Wrong Information”, and so on.

But although the technology industry is no longer seen as active monitoring after the elections, it is unable to do so no Running of cultural, intellectual and religious values ​​of social conservatives. Social media addiction and chat chat that are marketed towards children, for example, they feed directly in the right panic on family values. (This was the subject of the committee, “Technology and the Family of the Family,”) The vital amendment and genetic amendment represent a direct insult to the Christian laws of nature. And humanity – the idea that technology will directly enhance humanity – is an insult to the creations of God, a point that indicates the first conference speech.

“The province revolves around human dignity and human prosperity,” said Rachel Boufard, Vice -President of Programs at the Institute of Antip matter Partnership, during the first speech of the conference. “By the definition, there is nothing like a conservative through man.”

Ball noticed that the right hatred of artificial intelligence was so deep that it had permanently denied Elon Musk, who once considered a real ideological ally. He said: “If the social conservative person will use the language model, they will use Grok, because they trust Grok.” But the moment when the musk released Grok Xai AI’s GROK XAI porn featureHe released “Hentai Sex Bots”, has lost the right of the right. (He is very The non -Christian position on solving the fertility crisis Do not help, too.)

Animus towards artificial intelligence in NATCON was intense enough to demand some previous heaters, such as joining trade unions. ((They) have a long history in the face of technological change and must be treated as sources of experience and knowledge, instead of the strength of the historical dead weight to combat modernity, “Tuscano argued at one time, adding that if Trump was able to combine the right wing and unions together,” he would have gone in history as one of the greatest presidents in America, if he did not save the man who did not save the future. “

When we talked the next day of the conference, Ball – one of the few in Natcon who expressed their optimism about the future of technology in America – expressed concern that the movement’s movement doubts in large technology cannot be overcome through strong political discussions. “I I am On the right, “he said:” But I say this to my friends on the right all the time: you can do a very reasonable discussion about what, technically, we must do to make the chat safer for children. I don’t think a very fruitful discussion can take place if this is not your goal really, and in fact your goal is to prosecute, mainly, a kind of religious war against technology and technicians. “

At the beginning of the conference, Sankar – the representative of the most prominent artificial intelligence industry in Natcon, who could have had a Palantir relationship to the Trump administration if he said that the wrong thing in that room – seems to notice the street anger as well. In response to Miller, he said: “The reap of artificial intelligence outside the bottle – and this does not mean a future through man.” His own vision of Amnesty International was a powerful tool for Americans in the field of entrepreneurship “who are busy operating their sleeves.” He said that Amnesty International: “a unique American phenomenon,” a case claimed to be “changing the world and strengthening our values.”

Unfortunately, by the end of Natcon, no one agreed with Sankar. “Yes, artificial intelligence can have tremendous fluctuations,” Steve Bannon said during the closing notes. “But you look at a hole without a bottom. It is a negative side that no one understands and no one can express.

The crowd erupted in applause.