Anthourbroid agrees to the authors for at least $ 1.5 billion in the settlement of publishing rights. Amnesty International

Human agreed To pay at least $ 1.5 billion to Law of the lawsuit It was presented by a group of books who claim to violate copyright, estimated at $ 3,000 per work. The amount is much lower than that of the anthropoor had to pay if it lost the case in the trial. Experts said that the prosecutors may have received an amount of no less than billions of dollars as compensation, with some estimates that put the total number more than $ 1 trillion.

This is a first -class legal settlement that focuses on artificial intelligence and copyright in the United States, and the result may be how organizers and creative industries deal with legal debate on artificial intelligence and intellectual property.

“This prominent settlement exceeds any other known restoration of copyright. It is the first of its kind in the era of artificial intelligence. It will provide meaningful compensation for each separation work and put a precedent that requires artificial intelligence companies to pay the author of copyright. Godfrey LLP.

Man does not recognize any violations or responsibility. “If the settlement of today, if it is approved, it will solve the remaining old claims for the prosecutors. We are still committed to developing safe systems of artificial intelligence that helps people and organizations to expand their capabilities, develop a scientific discovery, and solve complex problems,” said Deputy Attorney General of the Alabaro Sariderhar in a statement.

The lawsuit, which was originally filed in 2024 at the American District Court of the Northern Region in California, was part of a More continuous wave It is a copyright that was presented against technology companies about the data they used to train artificial intelligence programs. Authors Andrea Partz, Kirk Wallace Johnson, and Charles Grayber claimed that the Antarbur trained its great language models for their work without permission, which violates the law of copyright.

In June, the senior boycott judge, William Al Sap Ruling Anthropor’s training was protected from artificial intelligence through the doctrine of “fair use”, which allows unauthorized use of publication and copyrights under certain circumstances. It was a victory for the technology company, but it came with a great warning. The anthropier relied on a collection of books pulled out of the so -called “shadow libraries”, including A reputable site Libgen, and Alsup decided that the authors should be able to bring the anthropology to the trial in a collective action on limiting their business.

“Anthropor has been downloaded more than seven million pirated copies of books, and did not pay anything, and these pirated copies have kept in her library even after she decided that she would not use it to train artificial intelligence (at all or again). The authors have argued that he should have been pushing anthropiser for the pirated library. This matter agrees.”

It is not clear how the literary world will respond to the terms of the settlement. Since this was a collective action “canceling the subscription”, the qualified authors will be able to be satisfied with the conditions for the exclusion request to file their own lawsuits. It is worth noting that the plaintiffs I made a movement Today to maintain the “subscription threshold” secrecy, which means that the public will not be able to reach the exact number of separation members who will need to cancel the subscription until the settlement is completed.

This is not the end of the legal challenges of human rights rights. The company also faces a lawsuit from a group of major registration stickers, including Universal Music Group, which claims that the company used copyright -protected words to train Claude Chatbot. Prosecutors are now trying to modify their case to include allegations that Antarbur has used the file sharing service from analog. I mentioned In the court files, they may file a new lawsuit for piracy if they are not allowed to amend the current complaint.

This is a developing story. Please check again for updates.