Sam Al -Taman is right and wrong in the future of pictures

I am annoyed, not for the first time, through something that Sam Al -Gman said. But this time because I am annoyed by how I agree to what he says – although I think his statement is a kind of nonsense.

In a recent interview with him, journalist Clement Abram Altman asked how people would be able to know what is real and what is in a convincing era of content created by artificial intelligence. Specifically, they indicate rabbits. You know the one that I mean: In some of the ring camera shots from the rear courtyard, the discovery and jumping on the trampoline. Very cute! Very healthy! Even completely from the resulting AI! Virusi video, definitely went before people liked and realized that he was Amnesty International.

So what happens with the improvement of technology and artificial intelligence content everywhere? How will we know what is real? E, may not, seem to say. For example, it indicates something that I spend a lot of time thinking about: phone cameras.

“Even the image you take from your iPhone today, it’s like, mostly real but not, it’s not a little.” A lot of treatment occurs between photons that strike the images and the final image, he says, and what we end up is a type of improved version of reality. Certainly, he is right. Any old digital camera makes a million decisions about a scene: contrast, and intensity, which the pixels units should be red and either green. The camera of the phone goes further further, as it combines data from different frames, decomposing what the Earth is and what is the sky, and bright faces to look a little more.

Altman’s point is that we accept this level of manipulation as “real”, although we know there is more. When artificial intelligence content becomes more common, “I think the threshold of a real range must be considered real will continue to move,” he says. This is when I started sticking to a dismantling.

For beginners, there is a big difference between the image that begins with photons that strike a sensor and a zero plant with artificial intelligence. If it is on the spectrum, this is a great spectrum of God’s curse. I also think most people no In recognition of the type of treatment that occurs when they take a picture with a phone, not liberal as his statements indicate. Your iPhone camera is not in the field of changing details or adding things that were not there. Even when it seems to do something terrible, The interpretation is usually very simple. Certainly, sometimes Satan’s face occurs. Ai moon one thingAnd you can Get Gent-EAI editing devices with Google Photos. But I have not seen evidence that the cameras themselves go beyond the rogue and add elements that were not in the past five years of testing every major phone in the United States market.

Calling the phone camera as an example of the acceptable reality is annoying, but I think Altman is generally right. Our understanding of what is real and not changed when Photoshop took off. I know that all kinds of gradual and editing go to the magazine cover image, but I still accept a picture of Jessica Parker on the cover Vogue Magazine As “real”. This understanding has already changed in the era of artificial intelligence when we look at a picture on social media, an advertisement, or a list of products – and this will only continue. But Altman means that with our definition of “real” or “real” changes, we will appreciate all of this like something we see with our own eyes. After all, we enjoy science fiction movies although we know they are not real, as he points out.

But I think we are still going to nursing Whether there is something real or not and calibrating us accordingly. The rabbits on the trampoline is much less fun when you know it is not real. The complete hypothesis of the thing is “Look at the funny thing that these rabbits did.” This is just funny if it is real! If social media becomes mired in nice but unrealistic videos, I do not think I will stop care and enjoy them. I think I will stop enjoying the application of social media. who knows? Maybe I will spend More time with LTE smart watch Less time with my future.