Scientists say that the new government climate report directs their work

“The climatic working group and the Ministry of Energy are looking to deal with objective comments after the suspension period for 30 days,” Woods wrote. “This report is critically evaluated by many areas of continuous scientific investigation that are often set high levels of confidence-not by scientists themselves but by the relevant political bodies, such as the United Nations or previous presidential departments. Unlike previous departments, the Trump administration is committed to engaging in a more thinking and science-based conversation on regular energy and energy.”

Ben Santry, climate researcher and professor of Fakhry at East Anglia University, has a long history with some authors of the new report. (Santer’s research was also mentioned in the DOE report, just like other scholars who spoke to WIRED, the report says “mainly distort” his work.)

In 2014, Santer was part of an exercise at the American Physical Society (APS), one of the largest scientific membership organizations in the country. It is known as Red Team Vs Blue Team Exercise, and she has incited supporters of the prevailing climate science against the contradictory – including two authors of the current DOE report – to work through whether their claims are worth.

Steve Konin, one of the new appointments in the Ministry of Energy and the author of the report. As climate news inside I mentioned In 2021, Konin resigned from his leadership role after APS refused to adopt a modified climate science statement suggested after exercise. Later, Konin has not failed to failed to exercise similar to the White House Trump I.

“These men have a history of error in important scientific issues,” says Santer. “The idea that their views have been given short Sharifa by the scientific community is just a clear mistake.”

The work of Hausfather twice in the report was cited in the emissions department: the amount of participation.₂ You will be emitted in the air under different different tracks. Hausfather says these testimonies are “useful” to find out how the authors of the Ministry of Energy report “they receive CherryPick data that are appropriate for their novel.”

The report includes a plan from a 2019 paper The authors of the Ministry of Energy say that the climate models “may exaggerate the continuing notes.”₂. However, Hausfather Wire tells, the main conclusion of his 2019 research is that historical climate models were in reality significantly accurate in predicting apostasy.

“They seem to have ignored the entire paper as not fit for her novel, and instead they chose one character that was in supplementary materials to suspect the models, when the entire paper actually confirmed the quality of her performance in the years that followed,” says WIRED. (Hausfather’s research was also mentioned in the justifications for the Environmental Protection Agency for a decrease in the discovery of exposure – which he said in a mail On X, he draws a “completely back” conclusion of his work.)

Not only Hausfather is the one who feels that his work has been offended. A large part of the early part of the report discusses the benefit of carbon dioxide in growth growth, a claim This was repeated by Minister Wright as a “plus” for global warming. The authors cite a 2010 research from the evolutionary biologist Joy Ward, and now the Vice President of Case Western Reserve, to support allegations that plant life will flourish with more participants₂ In the air.