California Democrats may soon ban the new Glock pistols

Democrats who control California’s legislation are ready to ban the sale of one of the most popular types of pistols, such as the one owned by perhaps the most recognizable Democrat in the country of Kamala Harris.

A assembly Bill 1127 Aims to ban weapons stores from selling new Glock-Brand pistols and various imitators outside the brand, as weapons can become fully automatic if a criminal inserts a converter, usually known as a “Glock switch” into the weapon. The switches can be made illegally on a 3D printer.

Proponents say that the bill is only aimed at a narrow category of weapons, which are increasingly used in violent crimes. But critics say the proposal opens the door to wider restrictions on all semi-automatic pistols. This, according to them, potentially includes other popular models such as the Gavin Newsom government I recently received as a gift from a conservative podcaress. NEWSOM has not indicated whether it would sign the measure.

Semi -automatic pistols require Sagittarius to pull the trigger to shoot each circle. Fully automatic weapons, sometimes called machine guns, will continue to shoot as long as the trigger is depressed. Automatic weapons are already illegal under state and federal laws for all, except for special permits holders.

Illegally modified, fully Glock -style automatic pistols have been used in several high -profile shootings including a 2022 Gang Gunbight Outside the Sacramento nightclub, a few blocks of Capitol. The shooting killed six people and injured 12 more.

But Glocks are also among the most popular pistols sold in California. Weapon rights defenders say there are already more than 1 million in California in California – and only a small part of them have been illegally modified. As an example of how popular the Glocks are, Harris, while she is running for president, said.60 minutes“Last year, she owned Glock and that she shot him. Harris spokesman did not answer interview requests or when asked if he still owns a gun.

In anticipation of the proposal, it would not ban Harris or others who already own Glocks to keep their own. They could also sell used to others in transactions with private countries. The Californians just couldn’t buy a new one. It is unclear how many Glocks are sold in California every year, as weapons regulators and manufacturers do not publicly report sales numbers across the country.

Police are widely wearing Glocks in California, but they will be released from restrictions.

How about Gavin Newsom’s new pistol?

The lead author of the measure, a member of the Assembly Jesse GabrielDemocrat, representing the ENCHino area, told the Senate Judiciary Committee this month that if weapons manufacturers do not like the ban, they can redesign their weapons to make them less easy to convert into crankcases.

“Most pistol designs do not have this problem and this legislation is closely focused on a limited number of designs that are extremely easy to modify,” ” he saidS “Unfortunately, some participants in the weapons industry have been aware of this issue for decades and refuse to do something meaningful to deal with it.”

Weapon rights defenders say Glock has already reworked new models to be incompatible with switches, but the California Department of Justice did not include these weapons In your list of pistols This can be purchased in the country.

More than two dozen statesIncluding California, they have already banned Glock switches, but California will be the first state to ban the gun. A similar bill introduced In New York, he stopped in the Senate of the state.

The bill in California, which has 12 democratic co -authors and associates, has already accepted the assembly, with only the Republicans voting against it. This is ready to do the same in the Senate, putting it on a path next month to go to the desk of the newest gun owner in the country, Newsom.

This month, conservative podcactor Sean Ryan gave the Newsom A Sig Sauer P365-XMacro gun while they both recorded a Tennessee podcast in Tennessee.

The gun will not fall under the provisions of AB 1127. The mechanisms of the weapon are designed differently than Glock and switches made for Glocks do not work.

But Parens Sam, the Central Owners of the California Weapons Owners, which opposed the bill, said it was possible that someone could one day project an illegal converter for the Newsom pistol. Plus, many semi-automatic pistols can be transformed into fully automatic with the right tools and know-how if anyone wants to risk a crime.

He said he would depend on the Prosecutor General Rob Bont to decide what guns to ban the sale in California if Newsom signed Gabriel’s bill in the law. Bont supports the proposal. The Bont’s Office did not return a message, but in a letter in support of the bill, he wrote that “California has one of the most lowest rates of death weapons in the country, and this is due to our strong laws for the safety of common sense.”

“These laws are effective and save lives,” Bont writes. “Forbidding this dangerous design drawback is an integral step in maintaining automatic weapons from our streets.”

Weapon defenders don’t like Newsom

Asked if he would sign the ban on the new Glocks, the Newsom press service said his office usually did not comment on the pending legislation.

“The governor left the firearm in Tennessee in the possession of Sean,” Newsom spokesman Easy Gardon said. “He works to ensure that he is properly transferred in accordance with the California law and will rule after this process is over.”

This will be the first firearm registered under the NEWSOM name as per San Francisco’s standardS

If Newsom wants to legally keep Sig Sauer, he will have to send it from a weapons dealer to Tennessee to a registered firearm in California.

After the gun arrives, Newsom will have to pass a background check, provide its fingerprints, take a pistol safety test, sign declarations, provide a driver’s license and documents containing its name and address as a current utility bill. He will have to undergo a 10-day waiting period. Paredes said Newsom will also have to pay about $ 300 dollars and taxes on the $ 700 pistol.

He will have to do everything himself, as weapons owners have to appear in person to do the documents.

Parendes said he did not expect Newsom to get a warm welcome if he went to a pistol store in California to make the transfer. NEWSOM is one of the most national ardent defenders of firearms ownership restrictionsand he supported some of the laws that make the acquisition of his pistol – and any ammunition I would like to shoot – So challenging and expensive.

“I bet there will be 10,000 people (protesters) in this weapons store on the day it enters to do it,” Parens said.

When Ryan gave Newsom Sig Sauer, Newsom told Podcaster that although he continued to support the weapons provisions that he said made the state safer, he “is not an anti-pistol at all.”

“The last thing that people would expect was that I respect this gift,” he said, according to San Francisco standard.

At least one pistol staff does not buy it.

Cassidi fat, assistant manager at Sacramento Black Rifle, a firearm dealer, said the Newsom was welcome to come to the store to process his deal with a gun.

“Obviously we would talk about garbage all the time,” said fat.