Environmental Protection Agency remains in the dark, as the agency dismantles the scientific research office

Many environmental protection agency scientists have confirmed that the current structure of the Ord, which allows research to occur independent of policies that take place in other parts of the agency, is crucial to producing high -quality work. One of them told WIRE that they worked in a scientific role in the Environmental Protection Agency policy office under the first Trump administration. There, they felt that their job was “an attempt to obscure science to support the policy decision that was already taken.” They said that the structure in Ord provides a layer of isolation between decision makers and the scientific process.

Ord was greatly distinguished in the 2025 project Delegate the driving documentThe policy plan, which is closely expected the Trump administration’s movements in his position. He described the branch as “precautionary, inflated, indisputable, closed, moved by the results, hostile to public and legislative inputs, and tends to follow the political and not purely scientific goals.” However, the plan was not suggested to get rid of the organization. But in March, The documents provided To the White House by the agency’s leadership, it suggested a solution, which led to a violent reaction from the Democrats in Congress.

In early May, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would reorganize its structure, which books At a front of newsweek “the agency improves” by “integrating scientific employees directly into our program offices.” The agency said it will create a new office for applied science and environmental solutions (OSE), which would sit under the official’s office.

The status of a lot of scientific work for Ord in politics offices, the world who previously worked in a policy office told WIRE, meaning “we will finally finish the vision of the science that was unnecessarily interested in the interests of politics. I don’t think this will lead to political decisions that can be supported experimentally.”

After announcing the reorganization of May, Ord employees were encouraged to apply for jobs in other parts of the agency. Many workers who spoke with WIRED say that job publications for these new positions were naked, with few descriptions of what might actually be required. One of the publication of the jobs that the publishing wireless designations are simply as “scientific functions and multidisciplinary engineering”, with no information about the field of topic, team, or required scientific experience.

The efforts to reorganize the Environmental Protection Agency have been temporarily stopped by lawsuits. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court Temporarily A preliminary judicial order prohibits more discounts in the mass in force in 17 federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency.

There was a bright point in a call on Monday: The Ourd Command told the employees that all the laboratories that followed the Ord will remain open, news that is going on, unlike some Previous reports. However, workers say it has become increasingly difficult to do the science of the Environmental Protection Agency. More than 325 Ord workers – in five orders – have taken a voluntary retirement since the beginning of the year, according to the spokesperson for the Environmental Protection Agency. The Wire world told that although they usually have a small team that helps in their field work, they have left to deal with everything on its own, including “washing dishes and bottles of signs.” They said that the exhausting new financial approval operations have also resulted in chemicals that were ordered to delay for several months and expensive equipment without any repairs.

Since he took office, Zealin explained that he intends to relax environmental regulations, especially about business: last week, last week Written by the editorial In Fox News how the agency will survey the clean air law that allows power stations and data centers to “make America the capital of artificial intelligence in the world”. Ord scientists fear that the solution of their office will not make this pro -business task easier.

“If you will end up the air quality regulations – we know, categorically, at this point, ozone pollution causes early deaths and chronic effects – if you decrease the rules, you will see deaths and surplus disease,” says one of the worlds. “I think (the leadership of the Environmental Protection Agency) does not want to know the answer to the matter of the bad thing.”