Volodymyr Zelensky clothes sparked a rebellion of polymers

Polymarket did not respond to a request for comment.

It was launched in 2020, Polymarket He rose to the forefront Last year, as a means of people to bet on the results of the US presidential elections. During the electoral cycle, Polymarkt and its preachers The appropriate prediction markets As a superior way to predict the results of traditional voting – as the most efficient “The source of the truth.But this proposal has faced a challenge through the Zelensky disaster.

“Everyone knows the answer … but the system is currently broken,” as Defipolice claims. “It is a sexual situation.”

Polymarket does not retain the right at the heart of UMA. Last year, the company Voting voting or On the bet on whether Baron Trump is involved in a encoded currency project under the title Trump. At that time, polymarket The backed bets He explicitly described the conclusion of Oma as a “mistake.” The company did not enter every time. In March, a 7 million dollar bet on whether Ukraine and the United States will reach a deal on access to minerals Premature With the wrong result. At that time, in a letter of disagreement addressed to affected users, polymer employee It was called “unprecedented situation” But he said he would not want teenagers.

Polymarket users affected by the potential result of the Zelensky prediction market gathered on Discord, the correspondence platform for response coordination, including following up a lawsuit against Polymarket and UMA, as they claim.

A bet of Polymarkt by the username deduction, who was at some point wins at some point in the amount of $ 300,000 over their bet, before they got out some money in response to confusion in one stage of the stages that $ 300,000 wins for their bet, before they got out some money in response to confusion: “I intend to join the lawsuit.” “I have faced moral damage to this catastrophe and the added context caused me a great deal of stress.”

Likewise, people on the Discord channel in UMA feel uncomfortable by the controversy, accusing members of society of each other of “Backchannel deals” and fraud. Some see it as an unlimited referendum in the entire project. “This is not just a vote on a lawsuit – it is a vote on the future of Oma.”

The final decision is expected to be on the evening of July 8. The UMA founder, Hart Lombur, says the organization plans to make adjustments to the conflict resolution in light of the controversy of the Zelensky suit, but it refuses to claim that voting has been manipulated in any way.

“There is no evidence of manipulating with Uma. I really don’t like those indisputable accusations,” says Lambor wmedi. “After dust settles in this high or not, I look forward to a fruitful conversation about improvements and design bangs.”

Langlot Charadonite, who voted as a delegate on behalf of the distinguished symbol group, who controls about 0.1 percent of the total offer. “This controversy simply reflects that the truth is complicated and varies from person to person.”

All this heat reaches a critical moment for polymarket, which is located in the middle of a round to collect aggressive donations led by the Peter Thiel’s Founders; According to Reuters, the prediction market It will be estimated In one billion dollars. It is not the perfect time to alienate some of its most active users, or for the integration of its markets. “The silence of Polymarket was deaf to the ears,” says Debolis.