Man wins a great victory for the fair use of Amnesty International – but he is still in trouble to steal books

A federal judge has stood for Anthropor in the issue of publishing rights, Amnesty International, Ruling on this training – Training only – Amnesty International models on books that have been purchased by law without the authors’ permission is fair use. It is a unique decision in favor of the artificial intelligence industry, but it is particularly limited specifically for the physical books purchased and concerted.

Judge William Al Soup In its decision, the Northern Province of California says that the company must face a separate trial of “millions” pirates from the Internet. The decision also does not address whether the outputs of the artificial intelligence model violate copyright, which are in the case in other relevant cases.

The lawsuit was filed by the book Andrea Partz and Charles Gray, Kirk Wallace Johnson, who A lawsuit against Antarubor last year for claims The company trained its family from Claude AI models on pirated materials. It is a pivotal decision that can affect how judges respond to publishing rights cases from artificial intelligence to move forward.

The ruling also deals with the Antarbur move to buy copies of book printing, tap their links, cut pages, and wipe them lightly into a central digital library used to train artificial intelligence models. The judge ruled that the digitization of a physical book that was purchased was a fair use, and that the use of these digital versions of LLM was adequately transformed to be fair.

“The authors’ complaint is not different from that if they complain that training schoolchildren to write well will lead to an explosion in competing works,” Judge Alsup writes, adding that the copyright law “seeks to advance the original authorship, not protecting the authors from competition.”

Despite these victories on Antarbur, Judge Alsup wrote that the Antarbur decision to store millions of pirate books in the company’s central library – even if some have not used training – is not considered a fair use. “This request doubts that any accused person can meet his burden on explaining the reason for downloading the source copies of the pirate sites It can buy or reach another way legally He himself was reasonably necessary for any subsequent just use. “Alsup (assuring him) writes.

Judge Alsup says that the court will hold a separate trial on pirated content used by the anthropologist, which will determine the resulting damage.