Trump signs a law taken in the law

President Donald Trump has signed the law on the law, as a draft law criminalizes the distribution of unusual intimate images (NCII) – including Ai Deepfakes – requires social media platforms to remove them immediately when notified.

The bill has sailed through both rooms of Congress with many technology companies, parents’ advocates and youth, and the first lady Melania Trump, who supports this issue. But critics – including the group that made its mission to combat the distribution of these images – warn that its approach can bring in reverse results and It harms the survivors who seek protection.

The law makes the publication of NCII, whether real or created from artificial intelligence, and it is criminally punished for up to three years in prison, as well as fines. It also requires that social media platforms have to remove NCII within 48 hours of notification and “make reasonable efforts” to remove any copies. The Federal Trade Committee has been assigned to enforce the law, and companies have a year to comply.

Under any other administration, Take Download is likely to see a lot of reaction by groups such as groups such as groups Electronic Borders Corporation (EFF) and Democracy and Technology Center (CDT), which warns of providing removal can be used for removal or cold, a wider set of content from the intended content, as well as threatening to update privacy techniques such as encryption, since the services that you use will have no way to see (or remove) messages between users. However FTC – Another layer of fear added to some critics of the law, who worried that it can be used to threaten or strangle political opponents. Trump said, after all, During a speech to Congress this year Once the bill is signed, “I will use this bill for myself as well, if you do not mind, because no one is treated worse on the Internet. No one.”

The Civil Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI), which calls for the anti -abuse legislation for a long time for the criminalization of the inaccurate distribution of intimate images (NDII). But CCRI said he could not support the Take It Download law because it may ultimately provide the “wrong hope”. Ali Bluezki, President of CCRI Mary Ann Franx It is called the provision of removal “Toxic pill … it is likely to end up to harm the victims more than it helps.”

“The platforms that feel confident that it is unlikely to target FTC (for example, the platforms that are closely corresponding to the current administration may feel simply ignoring NDII reports.” “The platforms that try to identify the original complaints may face a sea of ​​wrong reports that can overwhelm their efforts and expose their ability to work at all.”

In an interview with freedomFranks expressed concern that it might be “difficult people to analyze” providing removal. “This will be a year for a year,” she said. “I think as soon as this process occurs, you will see that FTC is very selective in how they deal with the supposed compliance of the basic system. It will not be about putting power in the hands of photographers to remove their content already.”

Trump, during his signing ceremony, referred to the criticism of the draft law. He said: “People talked about all kinds of first amendment, and the second amendment … They talked about any amendment they can compensate, and we got it.”

Legal challenges may not come to the most problematic parts immediately, according to Becca Branum, CDT deputy director. “It is ambiguity to think it will be difficult for the court to decompose when it is constitutionally imposed” before the platforms are forced to implement them. Ultimately, users can prosecute if they have legal content from platforms, and companies can ask the court to volatility if the Federal Trade Committee verifies or punished for breaking them – this depends only on the speedy implementation of the implementation.